Quality” Table 2. Contingency table, column relative frequencies (percentages): “Do you think that organic Answers Year Healthier Tastier More Appealing Higher Quality foods are healthier, tastier, extra appealing, or of higher quality”Definitely yes AnswersDefinitely yes Rather yesRather noRather noRather yesDefinitely noDefinitely noI Idon’t know never know2016 Year 2019 2016 2016 2019 2019 2016 2016 2019 2019 2016 2019 2016 2016 2019 2019 2016 2016 201920.Healthier 22.14 20.21 56.86 22.14 56.22 56.86 15.53 56.22 13.78 15.53 13.78 3.53 three.53 three.84 three.84 three.86 3.86 4.01 four.7.72 Tastier ten.11 7.72 33.53 ten.11 37.68 33.53 38.29 37.68 32.75 38.29 32.75 7.72 7.72 8.19 eight.19 12.74 12.74 11.28 11.4.Additional Appealing 9.94 four.52 26.13 9.94 31.83 26.13 47.33 31.83 37.43 47.33 37.43 12.24 12.24 ten.69 10.69 9.78 9.78 ten.11 10.27.Greater Top quality 24.06 27.36 49.06 24.06 52.05 49.06 15.37 52.05 14.12 15.37 14.12 2.71 2.71 3.93 three.93 5.51 five.51 5.85 five.Source:Own calculations. Source: Own calculations.2D Plot of Row and Column Coordinates; Dimension: 1 x two Input Table (Rows x Columns): 4 x five Standardization: Row and column profiles 0,Dimension two; Eigenvalue: ,00173 (1,450 of Inertia) 0,10 0,08 0,06 0,04 0,02 0,00 -0,02 -0,04 -0,06 -0,08 -0,10 -0,12 -0,five -0,4 -0,3 -0,two -0,1 0,0 0,1 0,two I do not know Tastier Undoubtedly yes Healthier Higher High-quality Rather yes Rather not Undoubtedly not Extra Attractive 2D Plot of Row and Column Coordinates; Dimension: 1 x 2 Input Table (Rows x Columns): 4 x 5 Standardization: Row and column profilesDimension 2; Eigenvalue: ,00654 (3,301 of Inertia)0,Healthier Rather yes Absolutely not A lot more Attractive0,0,00 Tastier -0,05 Greater High quality Absolutely yes -0,Rather not-0,I do not know-0,20 -0,-0,-0,-0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Dimension 1; Eigenvalue: ,18675 (94,22 of Inertia)Row.Coords Col.CoordsDimension 1; Eigenvalue: ,11656 (97,54 of Inertia)Row.Coords Col.CoordsFigure two. Correspondence map: “Do you believe that organic foods are: healthier, tastier, extra eye-catching, of larger quality” 2. Correspondence map: “Do you believe that organic foods are: healthier, tastier, a lot more eye-catching, of larger quality” Year 2016 year year 2019 (right). Source: Own calculations. Year 2016 (left), (left),2019 (suitable). Source: Own calculations.Table two and Figure 2 (right) describe the predicament in 2019. In accordance with the survey, organic meals in 2019 was viewed as healthier, too as of larger top quality than conventional food, while not much more appealing; see the table as well as the correspondence map (p-value is much less than 0.001, chi-square = 572.13, degrees of freedom = 12). The KRP-297 Description survey revealed a optimistic shift in organic meals popularity, see Table 3. The proportion of respondents who never purchased organic meals plunged to half of its original level. Even so, we recorded a rise within the quantity of respondents who Antibiotic PF 1052 Antibiotic didn’t care whether it was organic or not. Substantial statistical dependence was verified (p-value is much less than 0.001, chi-square = 88.02, degrees of freedom = 3).Agriculture 2021, 11,The survey revealed a optimistic shift in organic food popularity, see Table three. The proportion of respondents who by no means purchased organic food plunged to half of its original level. Nonetheless, we recorded a rise within the variety of respondents who didn’t care irrespective of whether it was organic or not. Important statistical dependence was confirmed (p-value is 7 of 16 significantly less than 0.001, chi-square = 88.02, degrees of freedom = 3).Table 3. Contingency table, column relative frequencies (percentage.
