Cted the focus of academia and media (Zhao and Zhao 2012; Wu 2017). In the point of view in the community improvement and charity help projects of frontier organizations for example the Amity Foundation and Hebei Jinde Charities Foundation (formerly called Hebei Jinde Charities Service Center, founded in 1997, the largest Catholic social service organization in China), beneficiaries have extended to young children (education), overseas poor people today, and so on., reflecting some new directions for the future development of Chinese Christian social solutions. Thirdly, the basic functions of social solutions are still in the recovery period, and also the organizational technique and service size usually are not complete and adequate. (a) Only several organizations have formulated their comparatively standardized operational standards for management systems, experienced services, and resource allocations. Since the mid-1980s, the two most renowned Christian social service organizations, Shanghai YMCA along with the Amity Foundation (Nanjing), happen to be major the approach of non-profit and professionalization of Chinese Christian social services (He and Wang 2015). In 1996, Shanghai YMCA and YWCA cooperated with all the government to establish the initial complete neighborhood service center in Shanghai as well as in China, which was independently managed and operated by the Christian non-profit organizations Luoshan Civil Center (Yang 2001a, 2001b). The Amity Foundation, established in 1985, is the biggest Christian foundation in China. There are actually 86 full-time staff in its headquarters, with an annual typical wage of CNY 106,000 and nearly 1000 staff in subordinate institutions and projects (Amity Foundation 2019; Qiu 2015). At present, except for a little variety of market-oriented particular education institutions, the majority of the nonprofit-oriented tiny and medium-sized organizations are faced with challenges for instance lack of funds, poor professionalism, and irregular organization and management (Liu 2013). Generally speaking, the current humanReligions 2021, 12,10 ofresources of Christianity in China are greater than they were prior to 1949, but the service scale and scope are far in the level before 1949 (Gao 2008). (b) The service department systems of church groups aren’t total. Christian social services in many countries and in regions of Hong Kong and Taiwan are primarily divided into two important systems: social services departments (like the social services division of Anglican Church in Hong Kong) plus the somewhat independent non-profit service organizations (for instance the Hong Kong YMCA and Hong Kong Christian Service). While China’s two national Protestant Ladostigil Biological Activity associations (CCC/TSPM) established the “social service department” as early as 2003, couple of in the key Christian organizations at the provincial level have set up their social service departments. In accordance with the statistics around the internet websites of officially recognized national Christian organizations and provincial (autonomous area and municipality) Christian churches (January 2020), China’s national CCC/TSPM setup a full-time social service department, and China’s Catholic “one meeting 1 group” set up a public charity and social service committee; 11 of 31 provincial Christian churches in mainland China have set up sites (20 provinces haven’t)10 . Only Shandong and Hunan provinces have setup part-time qualified committees of social services. Usually speaking, the direct service effectiveness of so.
